Appendix 2 – Comparison of key income definitions for: Working for Families Tax Credits, child support and student loans
✔ Included in income ✘ Not included in income
TYPE OF INCOME | Working for Families Tax Credits | Child support (current rules)[33] | Child support (2013 reform proposal) | Student loans |
---|---|---|---|---|
Net income | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Available tax losses | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ |
Non-resident foreign source income | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Net loss from investment or business activity | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Exempt income | ||||
|
✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
|
✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
Portfolio Investment Entity (PIE) income | ||||
|
✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
Main income equalisation accounts | ||||
|
✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Share of undistributed income of a closely held company | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
Associated persons share included | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ |
Certain contributions to retirement savings schemes[34] | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ |
Certain distributions from superannuation schemes, distribution of retirement scheme contribution | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
Settlor share of non-beneficiary income or undistributed income of a closely held company owned by trustees | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
Employment benefits (person has no control over company) | ||||
|
✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
|
✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
Employment benefits (person has control over company) | ||||
|
✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ |
Non-beneficiary income from a trust (not settlor) (specifically provided) | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ |
Depreciation loss (allowed 2002–03 or earlier income year) clawed back on sale of buildings | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ |
Income greater than $500 derived by dependent child | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Child tax credit | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Other income (subject to exclusions and $5,000 de minimus) | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ |
Deduction from income for maintenance payments made (for example child support) | ✔ | ✘ | ✔[35] | ✘ |
33 Other than through an adminstrative review.
34 Contribution already included in a return of income for the income year the contribution is made and therefore in "net income" for social policy purposes.
35 Deduction allowed under the 2013 child support proposal but would have required amendment to avoid circularity in income calculation.