Skip to main content
Inland Revenue

Tax Policy

Charging for binding rulings and GST and fees for non-resident applications

(Clauses 88 and 89)

Summary of proposed amendments

The bill introduces a more flexible fee waiver provision and a reduction of 1/9th of the fee for zero-rated supplies of binding rulings by amending the Tax Administration (Binding Rulings) Regulations 1999. The amendments will allow such factors as the nature of the issue and the skill and experience applied by Inland Revenue staff in providing the rulings to be taken into account in charging for binding rulings. The amendments also bring the Regulations in line with existing GST policy.

Application date

The amendments will apply new rulings made from the date of enactment.

Key features

The Tax Administration (Binding Rulings) Regulations 1999 will be amended to provide for a more flexible fee-waiver provision based on what the Commissioner considers is fair and reasonable. The fees for zero-rated supplies of binding rulings will be reduced by the tax fraction of the fee.

Background

Private, product and status binding rulings all incur fees that are based on recovering the cost of providing the ruling. Currently, Inland Revenue may in exceptional circumstances, at the Commissioner’s discretion, waive in whole or in part any fee payable by an applicant. More flexibility is required for the exercise of the waiver. The Regulations will therefore change the requirement to one based on what is fair and reasonable having regard to such factors as the nature of the issue and the skill and experience applied by Inland Revenue staff.

The fees for zero-rated supplies of binding rulings will be reduced by the tax fraction of the fee. Currently, the fees assume a GST rate of 12.5% and do not take into account the fact that binding rulings issued to non-residents outside New Zealand may be zero-rated under the Goods and Services Tax Act 1985. Therefore, any binding ruling issued to a New Zealand resident is in effect cheaper than if that same ruling were supplied to a non-resident. This is because the New Zealand resident, if registered for GST, can generally claim an input tax credit for the GST cost of acquiring the binding ruling. The non-resident, on the other hand, is unlikely to meet the requirements for registration or input tax credit entitlement.